Not for ethics or whatever but for more options to play. With WZ2 you get just warzoneā¦ gets boring after a whileā¦ at least to meā¦ with MW2, you have a campaign, multiplayer, invasion, Ground War and co-op missions as well. I think if youāre looking to play long term , then the full game is worth the asking price. Hope this helps! 1.
It will be soon enough. XDefiant which is an arcade shooter with old school COD mechanics is F2P. I think the game is going to explode, and give COD enough competition that they force Activision to avoid stagnation. Modern COD multiplayer is a second class citizen, because BR is the favorite child. I think things will change for the better soon.If youāre interested in the plot, there are two main timelines. The Modern Warfare timeline consists of CoD4, MW2 (2009), and MW3. The Black Ops timeline consists of WAW, WW2, Vanguard, BO1, BOCW, MW (2019), MWII (2022), BO2, BO4, and BO3. There is also the original CoD trilogy, which consists of CoD1-3 and may be a part of either major Modern warfare 2019 and Cold War had better offline multiplayer that was fully playable, the campaign is good that can only be played some many time before it gets stale. but when you have connection issues and bad internet you need play offline multiplayer. Even modern warfare 2019 had optional packs to install the full multiplayer experience. 2.
Huge improvement. MW2 is chaos. Equipment actually works. Even if you have the dull flash bang perk it still hits hard enough to be viable. Not perfect but way better that cold wars silent matches. Ads even feels better to me in MW2. That could just be imagination though. 24. Genos_Senpai.I am consistently on losing teams getting their asses kicked in game modes domination, td, and hardpoint. I am an average casual player that plays 2-3hrs a day. I am barely keeping a 1.0 k/d stat and I lose on avg 7-8 games out of 10. I have barely had any fun since game release because of the sbmm bullshit. I am normally a 1.50-2.25 k/d player. yWas.